Yesterday was the second time - I’m aware of, anyway - that Glenn Greenwald has blasted CNN’s John King for his meager, suck up brand of journalism.
Back in January, Greenwald first mocked King for the softball questions he threw at McCain regarding his presidential campaign.
Now, in a new article posted yesterday, Greenwald chastised King for his meager effort in interviewing DNI Mike McConnell regarding the issues around the Protect America Act (PAA) update to FISA law. During the interview, King admitted ignorance of the subject up front and pretty much allowed McConnell to spout all the unchallenged rhetoric he could fit in. Hollow journalism on the campaign trail is one thing; but, sandbagging an interview with one of the government officials at the heart of pushing Congress into legislating ex post facto laws in order to hide illegal activity, and weakening civil liberties in the process, is quite another. Greenwald exasperates:
Still, it’s pretty extraordinary that CNN — the most trusted name in news — would invite a high government official onto its news program to invoke his authority and claimed expertise to scare Americans into believing that we’re all going to be killed by Terrorists unless President Bush gets what he wants, and have the “journalist” conducting the interview admit upfront that he knows nothing about the topics. What’s the point of the exercise? Why allow a government official to come onto your show and make statements that the interviewer — due to total ignorance about the subject — has no ability to analyze, scrutinize, or subject to critical inquiry? Providing a platform to government officials to make controversial claims with no scrutiny is (by definition) called “propaganda,” not journalism.
Emph mine. But, what I really wanted to draw some attention to was some background info on McConnell that Greenwald quotes from a Salon article by Tim Shorrock:
With revenues of $3.7 billion in 2005, Booz Allen is one of the nation’s biggest defense and intelligence contractors. Under McConnell’s watch, Booz Allen has been deeply involved in some of the most controversial counterterrorism programs the Bush administration has run, including the infamous Total Information Awareness data-mining scheme. As a key contractor and advisor to the NSA, Booz Allen is almost certainly participating in the agency’s warrantless surveillance of the telephone calls and e-mails of American citizens. . . . .
Booz Allen, along with Science Applications International Corp., General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, CACI International and a few other corporations, is one of the dominant players in intelligence contracting. Among its largest customers are the NSA, which monitors foreign and domestic communications, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, an amalgamation of the imagery divisions of the CIA and the Pentagon that was established in 2003. . . .
And in a relationship that has been completely missed in media coverage of his appointment, McConnell is the chairman of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance, the primary business association of NSA and CIA contractors. As INSA chairman, I’ve been told, McConnell is presiding over an initiative to enhance ties between the intelligence agencies and their contractors and domestic law enforcement agencies.
Isn’t that something? Nah, there are no conflicts of interest, there… move along. More of Greenwald’s flair:
When it comes to claims about the need for telecom amnesty, you can’t get more conflicted than Mike McConnell. How can McConnell ever go into an interview, demand telecom amnesty on behalf of his industry, and not be asked about this? What’s the answer, John King? “To a guy like me who’s spent most of his time, in the past several months, out covering a presidential campaign, this is highly detailed stuff that’s pretty hard to follow.” Not only is McConnell never asked about this — I’ve literally never once heard any journalist question him about this — but worse, our journalists go out of their way to depict him as the opposite: the supremely objective, dispassionate straight-shooter whose only goal is Keeping Us Safe.
Well, the establishment media might not be up to the task of cutting through the Administration’s line of BS on the issue; but at least someone is. Check out The Carpetbagger Report’s evisceration of the White House’s official “Myth vs Fact” sheet on the surveillance and telecom immunity issues surrounding the PAA.